Chilean judiciary apologizes

In what the BBC has called an ‘unprecedented’ move, the Chilean National Association of Magistrates of the Judiciary has apologized for failing to protect the rights of those persecuted by the Pinochet regime in the 1970s and 80s. Coming just a week shy of the 40th anniversary of the September 11, 1973 coup that brought Pinochet to power, the judicial apology appears to come as part of a broader moment of reflection.

Although the executive branch and security forces clearly had the most to answer for at the time, it seems the judiciary played an entirely passive role:

The magistrates’ association acknowledged that the Chilean judiciary could and should have done much more to safeguard the rights of those persecuted by the dictatorship. It said the judges had ignored the plight of victims who had demanded their intervention.

Chilean courts rejected about 5,000 cases seeking help on locating missing loved ones abducted or killed by the authorities. Critics say their usual response was they had no information about their fate.

Such a judicial apology raises an interesting set of issues. Apologies are often seen as sensitive because even as symbolic acts, they can have material consequences. There is a fine line between taking moral responsibility for atrocities and taking legal responsibility for them and compensation claims are usually quick to follow.

For instance, the recent admission by the Farc in Colombia that it shared responsibility for the suffering that has resulted from its prolonged insurgency is seen as a prelude to wrangling over its liability to compensate victims in the ongoing peace negotiations with the Government.

However, apologies are usually issued by the executive or perhaps the legislative branch, with the consequences likely to be handled through the courts or administrative reparations programs. When a Court admits liability for violations in the form of systematic failure to provide remedies, what are the consequences of that? Its hard to imagine that the relatives of the disappeared turned away twenty years ago would be permitted to go back to those courts now in order to sue them.

It is also interesting to query whether this could lead to a trend. I suspect TN readers can think of other courts that may have failed to take the high road in the past or are neglecting to do so now. Any nominations for the next few judiciaries that should be getting in line for some sackcloth and ashes?

 

Advertisements

3 responses to “Chilean judiciary apologizes

  1. Pingback: Reparations for Chile’s exiles: upcoming guest-post on the Inter-American Court decision in García Lucero | TerraNullius

  2. Pingback: Chilean court orders compensation for tsunami damages | TerraNullius

  3. While we are on the topic, The BBC reports today on convictions in Chile of members of the former ‘Caravan of Death’ a sort of provincial execution squad that traveled to all the points in the countryside where local officials were too squeamish to take Pinochet’s coup to its logical conclusion:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-25499373

    The striking thing about the article for me was the distinction it highlights between straightforward procedural rule of law (or consistent application of laws regardless of their content) and the more human rights-friendly concept of substantive rule of law (where the content of the rules and the democratic nature of the process that produced them also count). Here is a telling excerpt:

    “Gen Pinochet said there would be no mercy for “extremists”, and was reportedly annoyed by news that some commanders in provincial towns had been “soft” on political opponents.

    He despatched an army unit under the command of Gen Sergio Arellano Stark to impose “uniform criteria in the administration of justice to prisoners”.

    The unit, which came to be known as the Caravan of Death, travelled from town to town in a Puma helicopter, armed with grenades, machine guns and knives, killing opponents of the coup.

    It arrived in the northern city of Antofagasta, where on 19 October 1973 it ordered that 14 political prisoners held there be taken to a ravine. There, the men were executed by firing squad. The prisoners had been tried and convicted by military tribunals but not yet sentenced.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s